Bug#804246: transition: gsl
On 20 November 2015 at 11:45, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
| On 09-11-15 18:21, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
| > On 06/11/15 15:06, Bas Couwenberg wrote:
| >> Package: release.debian.org
| >> Severity: normal
| >> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
| >> Usertags: transition
| >> Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gsl.html
| >>
| >> An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.
| >>
| >> It caused nco to FTBFS and I suspect other reverse dependencies will
| >> likewise need to be updated to build successfully with gsl (2.0+dfsg-1).
| >>
| >> The automatically created transition tracker is already available.
| >>
| >> The maintainer is CC'ed.
| >
| > Any idea how many packages fail to build against the new version? Not speaking
| > of how many need to change the build dependencies from libgsl0-dev (>= x.y) to
| > libgsl-dev, but of build failures in all the rdeps due to API changes.
|
| I haven't tested any gsl rdeps other than those maintained by the Debian
| GIS team, and those rebuilds are already available in unstable.
|
| Can we binNMU the remaining rdeps and see what breaks?
Sounds good to me.
| Or should Dirk or someone else first rebuild the rdeps themselves before
| this transition can move on?
Do you happen to have a list of what has / has not rebuilt?
Dirk
--
http://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org
Reply to: