Bug#749395: marked as done (transition: vtk5 to vtk6)
Your message dated Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:47:51 +0100
with message-id <564EDE37.40404@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#749395: transition: vtk6
has caused the Debian Bug report #749395,
regarding transition: vtk5 to vtk6
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
749395: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=749395
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: vtk6
- From: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 20:16:00 +0200
- Message-id: <CALF6qJnsgMH5ckYdK7tELBd_wg=h3Kq4gLwdmqQarOnBPfya9A@mail.gmail.com>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Dear release team,
the new version of VTK-library is already in archive. Thus I would
like to start a smooth transition of packages, which are dependent
on 5.8 version to 6.
All of those package require source uploads, so I ask you just to set
transition page to have an overview and I will start to NMU of affected
packages.
Ben file:
title = "vtk6";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libvtk5.8" | .depends ~ "libvtk6";
is_good = .depends ~ "libvtk6";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libvtk5.8";
Thanks
Anton
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org>, 749395-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#749395: transition: vtk6
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 20 Nov 2015 09:47:51 +0100
- Message-id: <564EDE37.40404@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <CALF6qJmy+G2EcqMCpkbvqLrC9N5B3wQEH+XDcKiWRDFQboK1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <CALF6qJnsgMH5ckYdK7tELBd_wg=h3Kq4gLwdmqQarOnBPfya9A@mail.gmail.com> <20141019095418.GA7115@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <CALF6qJm8qvcjnG1oSpzPCbXntdTM9EVZzn3sk1Y5kAyk3knsjA@mail.gmail.com> <cbfeef77093f5fab9326bf1e3e4f6bd0@hogwarts.powdarrmonkey.net> <CALF6qJmy+G2EcqMCpkbvqLrC9N5B3wQEH+XDcKiWRDFQboK1eQ@mail.gmail.com>
On 21/10/14 21:18, Anton Gladky wrote:
> 2014-10-20 17:46 GMT+02:00 Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>:
>> Ok, that sounds sensible. Is it reasonable to support both vtk5 and vtk6 in
>> Jessie then?
>
>
> For Jessie - yes, but we should try to migrate all vtk5-dependent packages
> to vtk6 till Debian 9.
vtk 5 is no longer in testing, so from a RT POV, this is done. However, you can
keep porting the remaining vtk5 rdeps to vtk6 so they can enter testing and be
released with Stretch.
Cheers,
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: