Bug#804900: marked as done (nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2)
Your message dated Mon, 16 Nov 2015 20:09:42 +0100
with message-id <564A29F6.5020504@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#804900: nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #804900,
regarding nmu: flightgear_3.4.0-2 fgrun_3.4.0.final-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
804900: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=804900
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
nmu flightgear_3.4.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libsimgear*3.4.0v5"
nmu fgrun_3.4.0.final-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libsimgear*3.4.0v5"
Rebuild for the simgear C++v5 transition. (Packages are not in testing).
Despite the changelogs of these recent uploads, the buildd builds
happened before libsimgear*v5 passed NEW.
Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 12/11/15 19:33, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> nmu flightgear_3.4.0-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libsimgear*3.4.0v5"
> nmu fgrun_3.4.0.final-2 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild with libsimgear*3.4.0v5"
>
> Rebuild for the simgear C++v5 transition. (Packages are not in testing).
>
> Despite the changelogs of these recent uploads, the buildd builds
> happened before libsimgear*v5 passed NEW.
I noticed this and was waiting for simgear to clear NEW. Thanks for the remainder.
Scheduled.
Emilio
--- End Message ---
Reply to: