Bug#804246: transition: gsl

[Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>]

Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html

On 08/11/15 12:44, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 07-11-15 21:39, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
>> On 7 November 2015 at 20:17, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>> | Hi Dirk,
>> | 
>> | On Fri, 06 Nov 2015 15:06:14 +0100 Bas Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl>
>> | wrote:
>> | > An uncoordinated transition to GSL 2.0 has started in unstable.
>> | 
>> | please file RC bugs against the packages that have a versioned B-D on
>> | libgsl0-dev (since that will not be satisfied by the Provides in
>> | libgsl-dev).
>>
>> Good idea.
> 
> The automatically generated transition tracker needs a small improvement
> to handle libgsl0-dev too. Currently it marks all packages as bad that
> depend on libgsl0-dev (with or without version requirement), but since
> libgsl0-dev is provided by the new libgsl-dev only packages with a
> versioned dependency on libgsl0-dev need to marked as bad.
> 
> The attached ben configuration implements the above. It correctly marks
> pktools (2.6.4-4) as good, its -dev package depends on libgsl0-dev
> without a version requirement, and its other binary package depend on
> the new libgsl2.
> 
> @Release Team, can you update the gsl transition tracker?

That didn't seem to work well. I have created one that seems to work:

https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/gsl.html

Cheers,
Emilio