Bug#797926: transition: openssl: remove SSLv3 methods
- To: Kurt Roeckx <kurt@roeckx.be>, 797926@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Bug#797926: transition: openssl: remove SSLv3 methods
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 1 Nov 2015 15:22:29 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 56362025.9050409@debian.org>
- Reply-to: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>, 797926@bugs.debian.org
- In-reply-to: <562EA92A.3090708@debian.org>
- References: <20150903185104.GA15837@roeckx.be> <20150903200617.GI3107@betterave.cristau.org> <20150903210427.GA21613@roeckx.be> <20150903213633.GD3691@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <20150909102515.GC5779@roeckx.be> <20150916211710.GD6248@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <20151024092247.GA24722@roeckx.be> <562EA92A.3090708@debian.org>
On 26/10/15 23:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 24/10/15 11:22, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 16, 2015 at 10:17:10PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>> On Wed, Sep 09, 2015 at 12:25:16PM +0200, Kurt Roeckx wrote:
>>>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 10:36:33PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
>>>>>> So do I start with an soname change and upload that to
>>>>>> experimental?
>>>>>
>>>>> Yes please.
>>>>
>>>> So that has passed the new queue now. Please let me know when I
>>>> can start this in unstable.
>>>
>>> Looking at the tracker there are (as I suspected) quite a number of
>>> collisions with the ongoing g++ work. We'll try and arrange a slot when
>>> things are calmer.
>>
>> So any idea when you'll have time for this?
>
> Possibly after the perl one, if the libstdc++ one allows for this (I need to
> check). This is in my radar.
Do the rdeps build against the new version? IOW, are there any users of the
removed methods?
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: