On 08/19/2015 09:48 AM, Simon McVittie wrote: > On Mon, 10 Aug 2015 at 21:34:24 +0200, IOhannes m zmoelnig wrote: >> I have uploaded "assimp_3.1.1~dfsg-4" to "experimental". > ... >> Please schedule binNMUs for the above mentioned packages on all architectures. > > Packages in unstable are not binNMU'd against dependencies from > experimental, and this transition is mostly about what happens in > unstable. yes sure. i've uploaded to experimental in order to clear the NEW status. my mail / this bug is mostly about coordinating the upload to unstable + binNMU. (i'm in the lucky position that my libs haven't needed transitions yet; so i'm a bit of a newbie here...) > > assimp does not appear to have any C++ dependencies other than libstdc++, > and the current policy is that the v5 transitions can be started for any > package whose dependencies have started their transitions, so please upload > either 3.0 or 3.1.1 to unstable with the libassimp3v5 package name. > Upload whichever version you consider to be lower-risk. great. in this case i will upload 3.1.1 to unstable. mvsadr IOhannes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature