[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#806735: marked as done (transition: glibc)

Your message dated Wed, 16 Dec 2015 23:33:22 +0100
with message-id <5671E6B2.4090603@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#806735: transition: glibc
has caused the Debian Bug report #806735,
regarding transition: glibc
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
806735: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=806735
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

We would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.21. It is currently
available in experimental and has been built successfully on all release
architectures. We have fixed the hppa and mips64el build failure in the,
SVN, so the next upload should really build everywhere.

As the glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition:
- bro
- dante
- libnih
- libnss-db
- unscd

Here is the corresponding ben file:

title = "glibc";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.22\)/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.20\)/;

In addition to that, a few new symbols have been added that might prevent
a few other packages to transition to testing if they pick up the new
symbols. However the new symbols are quite limited this time, so it's
unlikely to happen if the transition is done relatively quickly.

Thanks,
Aurelien

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 01/12/15 23:29, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> On 2015-11-30 18:12, Julien Cristau wrote:
>> Control: tag -1 confirmed
>>
>> On Mon, Nov 30, 2015 at 17:01:35 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
>>
>>> We would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.21. It is currently
>>> available in experimental and has been built successfully on all release
>>> architectures. We have fixed the hppa and mips64el build failure in the,
>>> SVN, so the next upload should really build everywhere.
>>>
>> Go ahead, let us know when it's built everywhere and binNMUs need to be
>> scheduled.
> 
> Thanks. I have uploaded it and it's now build for all architectures in
> the main archive. It sill have to be built on alpha, hppa, m68k and
> sh4. I guess we can start the binNMUs anyway, as we have to use
> --extra-depends unless we are sure all the chroots are up-to-date.

glibc just migrated. Closing this.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: