[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#807128: marked as done (nmu: gcc-5_5.3.0-3)



Your message dated Sun, 6 Dec 2015 14:16:36 +0100
with message-id <56643534.6090508@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#807128: gcc-5-base: Differing changelog.Debian.gz between :i386 and :amd64
has caused the Debian Bug report #807128,
regarding nmu: gcc-5_5.3.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
807128: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=807128
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: gcc-5-base
Version: 5.3.0-3
Severity: serious

Unpacking gcc-5-base:amd64 (5.3.0-3) over (5.2.1-27) ...
Preparing to unpack .../gcc-5-base_5.3.0-3_i386.deb ...
Unpacking gcc-5-base:i386 (5.3.0-3) over (5.2.1-27) ...
dpkg: error processing archive /var/cache/apt/archives/gcc-5-base_5.3.0-3_i386.deb (--unpack):
 trying to overwrite shared '/usr/share/doc/gcc-5-base/changelog.Debian.gz', which is different from other instances of package gcc-5-base:i386

The :amd64 package (built on the buildd) has unstable as the target
distribution in the changelog, but the (maintainer built) :i386 package
has experimental, thus causing the mismatch between the two.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386, arm64

Kernel: Linux 4.2.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 06/12/15 01:38, James McCoy wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 05, 2015 at 08:37:15PM +0100, Matthias Klose wrote:
>> no binNMU please.
> 
> Why?  Are you planning to do a sourceful upload?  If not, that would
> resolve the installability issues that people are going to encounter.

3.5.1-1 was uploaded. Closing this.

Emilio

--- End Message ---

Reply to: