Michael Shuler: > On 11/25/2015 03:18 PM, Andrew Ayer wrote: >> Hi Stable Release Managers, >> >> We're currently discussing in #806239 how to keep the >> ca-certificates package more up-to-date in (old)stable. Since >> ca-certificates is a data package that needs timely updating (when CAs >> are removed due to lapsed audits, they should be distrusted >> immediately), it satisfies the criteria for stable-updates posted here: >> >> https://www.debian.org/News/2011/20110215 >> >> I just wanted to confirm that the SRMs would be OK pushing out new >> ca-certificates packages through stable-updates. > > Hi release team, > > I just requested an upload of ca-certificates (20151204) to unstable, > and I would like to follow that up with stable-pu and oldstable-pu > updates to include the current Mozilla CA bundle changes for jessie and > wheezy. > > I appears that I did a wheezy-pu update last year on #743156, but wanted > to clarify if these upcoming uploads will be acceptable. > Hi, Thanks for the interest in patching ca-certificates in the stable releases. Could I perhaps convince you to file this (kind of) request as a pu bug? They are much easier for us to track than mails to the mailing list. I appreciate that you might have been sending this mail to avoid the pu-bug. Unfortunately, we often end up forgetting the mail on our TODO list if it is not listed in the bug tracker. Thanks, ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature