Bug#802959: marked as done (RM: elki/0.6.5~20141030-1 from testing)
Your message dated Sun, 25 Oct 2015 17:41:46 +0000
with message-id <1445794906.1717.24.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#802959: RM: elki/0.6.5~20141030-1 from testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #802959,
regarding RM: elki/0.6.5~20141030-1 from testing
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
802959: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=802959
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
Please remove the "elki" package from _testing_ to unblock libbatik-java.
An API change in batik made the packages incompatible.
ELKI version 0.7.0 will be compatible with both batik version again,
but I'm slightly behing schedule for updating the package.
The problem does *not* exist in "stable" (which has the old batik).
Since "elki" has only a tiny user base, I believe it is reasonable to
temporarily remove it from testing and have it requalify again.
See also: #799990 (FTBFS with new Batik)
and the discussion on the debian-java team list.
Thanks,
Erich
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, 2015-10-25 at 17:03 +0100, Erich Schubert wrote:
> Please remove the "elki" package from _testing_ to unblock libbatik-java.
>
> An API change in batik made the packages incompatible.
> ELKI version 0.7.0 will be compatible with both batik version again,
> but I'm slightly behing schedule for updating the package.
Removal hint added.
Regards,
Adam
--- End Message ---
Reply to: