Your message dated Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:37:49 +0200 with message-id <561E84DD.9030702@debian.org> and subject line Re: Bug#801793: transition: polyml has caused the Debian Bug report #801793, regarding transition: polyml to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 801793: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=801793 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition: polyml
- From: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 17:17:45 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] F897DE75-7984-4035-B19A-677D215103B9@jrtc27.com>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Severity: normal X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org The latest upstream version of polyml has bumped the soname up to 6.0.0 (upstream had 2, 3, 4 and 5, including some minor version bumps, but none of these were ever packaged). Ben file: title = "polyml"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libpolyml1" | .depends ~ "libpolyml6"; is_good = .depends ~ "libpolyml6"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libpolyml1";Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: James Clarke <jrtc27@jrtc27.com>, 801793-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#801793: transition: polyml
- From: Emilio Pozuelo Monfort <pochu@debian.org>
- Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 18:37:49 +0200
- Message-id: <561E84DD.9030702@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] F897DE75-7984-4035-B19A-677D215103B9@jrtc27.com>
- References: <[🔎] F897DE75-7984-4035-B19A-677D215103B9@jrtc27.com>
On 14/10/15 18:17, James Clarke wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > Severity: normal > X-Debbugs-CC: debian-science-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org > > The latest upstream version of polyml has bumped the soname up to 6.0.0 (upstream had 2, 3, 4 and 5, including some minor version bumps, but none of these were ever packaged). AFAICS you have no rdeps at all. In this case there's no need to request a transition slot. Just go ahead and do it whenever you want. Cheers, Emilio
--- End Message ---