Bug#801441: jessie-pu: package bcfg2/1.3.5-1
On 2015-10-12 13:13, Arto Jantunen wrote:
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> writes:
Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
On Sat, 2015-10-10 at 09:43 +0300, Arto Jantunen wrote:
I would like to update bcfg2 in stable to match the version currently
in
testing to enable it to work with Django 1.7 (bug #755645). To do
this I would
add the attached patch, which looks much worse than it is due to the
db
migration files being moved around.
That is rather noisy, yes. :-(
Is there any chance we could have an interdiff of the before-and-after
patches, to highlight the actual differences between them? In any case
we'd need a full debdiff of a package built and tested on jessie
before
giving a definite ack.
The patch doesn't exist in jessie, so either interdiff isn't possible
or
I'm misunderstanding something.
The latter, although possibly because I wasn't clear enough.
The patch contains, for example:
src/lib/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0001_initial.py | 1006
+++++++++++---------
.../migrations/0002_convert_perms_to_mode.py | 171 ----
.../Reporting/south_migrations/0001_initial.py | 465 +++++++++
.../south_migrations/0002_convert_perms_to_mode.py | 171 ++++
What I was looking for was an indication of what the actual difference
between the two sets of files is, ignoring renames (e.g. are the two
0002_convert_perms_to_mode.py files actually exactly the same?).
The debdiff is attached (for convenience
built on jessie but without modifying the version number for a stable
update).
Sorry, I meant a _source_ debdiff (in practice, that's basically always
what's needed).
On the subject of the binary debdiff however...
Files in first set of .debs but not in second
---------------------------------------------
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0002_convert_perms_to_mode.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0003_expand_hash_key.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0004_profile_can_be_null.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0005_add_selinux_entry_support.py
-rw-r--r-- root/root
/usr/lib/python2.7/dist-packages/Bcfg2/Reporting/migrations/0006_add_user_group_entry_support.py
Shouldn't there be a corresponding set of files appearing in the second
package? (in /Reporting/south_migrations)
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: