Bug#801124: jessie-pu: package dns-root-data/2015052300+h+1
Control: tags -1 -moreinfo +confirmed
Hi,
On Tue, 2015-10-06 at 19:13 +0200, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> Hi Adam,
>
> On Tue, Oct 6, 2015, at 18:59, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 + moreinfo
> >
> > On 2015-10-06 15:32, Ondřej Surý wrote:
> > > H-ROOT will change it's IP addresses on 1 December 2015.
> > > dns-root-data package holds root zone that's used by some packages to
> > > bootstrap DNS root zone data. It might be good idea to update the
> > > package and binNMU the r-deps.
> >
> > That sounds like a good idea, yes. Please provide a debdiff for the
> > proposed upload to stable. It'll probably be easier if the binNMUs are a
> > separate bug once the package is in p-u.
>
> I am attaching the full diff as it makes the package in sync with the
> current root zone format, but only this part:
[...]
> -H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 A 128.63.2.53
> -H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 AAAA 2001:500:1::803F:235
> +H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 A 198.97.190.53
> +H.ROOT-SERVERS.NET. 3600000 AAAA 2001:500:1::53
> ;
> ; FORMERLY NIC.NORDU.NET
> ;
>
> is the important one.
>
> I can prepare just the smallest change possible or we can just pull
> whatever is in testing/unstable right now.
[...]
> The full sync is more convenient for me, but I can adjust to what's more
> convenient for release team.
Looking at the diff, I'd be happy with a 2015052300+h+1~deb8u1 upload as
a simple rebuild of the package in unstable; thanks.
> > [...]
> > > It looks like the same applies for D-ROOT IP address change (2013):
> > [...]
> > > and J-ROOT IP address change (happened 13 years ago #palmface):
> >
> > Are those also proposed to be fixed via the dns-root-data upload?
>
> Unfortunately not (yet), but it's my release goal for stretch to convert
> all DNS package to use one authorative source for DNS root zone data.
Okay, sounds good.
> > If not then please file separate p-u and/or binnmu bugs for any packages that
> > you're proposing to fix; a general "these things need fixing" bug
> > without concrete actions is awkward from a tracking perspective, as is
> > mixing multiple actions or packages in a single p-u request.
>
> This was more a "heads-up" than an action point, so yes, I definitely
> plan to follow up with more pus and/or binNMUs.
Okay.
Regards,
Adam
Reply to: