[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#797434: marked as done (nmu: rdeps of tinyxml (GCC-5 C++ transition))

Your message dated Wed, 16 Sep 2015 19:43:46 +0200
with message-id <55F9AA52.3010307@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: nmu: rdeps of tinyxml (GCC-5 C++ transition)
has caused the Debian Bug report #797434,
regarding nmu: rdeps of tinyxml (GCC-5 C++ transition)
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
797434: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=797434
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hello,

I am trying to help with the ongoing transitions here, specially the
GCC-5 C++ one, but I do not have much experience, so please double-check
if everything is correct.

The packages below have not been rebuilt yet for the new version of
tinyxml library with the v5 rename, nor have they been rebuilt recently
(> 1 month), so I think that binNMUing this will allow to progress in
these transitions:

  https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tinyxml.html


nmu antigrav_0.0.3-6 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu aseprite_1.0.9+ds-3 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu blobby_1.0-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu cbp2make_147+dfsg-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu cigi-ccl_3.3.3a+svn818-8 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu crtmpserver_1.0~dfsg-5 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu desmume_0.9.10-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu epiphany_0.7.0+0-3 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu garmin-plugin_0.3.23-1+b1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu gource_0.43-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu indigo_1.1.12-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu opencity_0.0.6.5stable-2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu openclonk_6.1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu opencolorio_1.0.9~dfsg0-3+b2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu openctm_1.0.3+dfsg1-1.1+b1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu openni_1.5.4.0-13 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu palabos_1.5~r1+repack1-1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu pokerth_1.1.1-2.2 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu qutecom_2.2.1+dfsg1-5.2+b1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu sofa-framework_1.0~beta4-9 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu tecnoballz_0.93.1-6 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"
nmu trigger-rally_0.6.1-0.1 . ALL . -m "rebuild against libtinyxml2.6.2v5"


Hope that helps.
--
Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Sun, 30 Aug 2015 18:39:27 +0100 "Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo"
<mafm@debian.org> wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I am trying to help with the ongoing transitions here, specially the
> GCC-5 C++ one, but I do not have much experience, so please double-check
> if everything is correct.
> 
> The packages below have not been rebuilt yet for the new version of
> tinyxml library with the v5 rename, nor have they been rebuilt recently
> (> 1 month), so I think that binNMUing this will allow to progress in
> these transitions:
> 
>   https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-tinyxml.html
> 
> 
> [...]
> 
> Hope that helps.
> --
> Manuel A. Fernandez Montecelo <manuel.montezelo@gmail.com>
> 
> 

Hi,

Thanks for the list.

At this point, packages have been scheduled back and forth.  I believe
we got all of them (that are in testing) except crtmpserver (which has a
hardcoded dependency, so binNMUing will not work).

Therefore I will close this bug now, as I do not think there are any
items left to schedule.

Thanks,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: