On 2015-09-14 17:54, Daniel Pocock wrote: > > > On 14/09/15 17:34, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: >> On Monday 14 September 2015 10:12:40 Daniel Pocock wrote: >>> https://release.debian.org/migration/testing.pl?package=postbooks tells >>> me that my package didn't migrate to testing because "libqt4-webkit is >>> not available in Debian" >>> >>> I unpacked the binary package[1] with "dpkg -e ..." and looking inside >>> the control file, libqt4-webkit is not mentioned anywhere. It only >>> depends on libqtwebkit4 (>= 2.1.0~2011week13) >>> >>> The source package has a build dependency on libqtwebkit-dev >>> >>> Furthermore, the update_excuses page[2] doesn't mention libqt-webkit4 at >>> all. >>> >>> Is there some special logic around the migration of qtwebkit reverse >>> dependencies now? Or is there some bug in the migration process? >> >> Nothing strange on our side, I would ask the Release Team about this :-/ >> >> > > Can anybody in the release team comment on this? > > [...] I have no clue why testing.pl concludes that postbooks depends on libqt4-webkit. However, that is a red herring. Sadly, it is not the most reliable/accurate service. The issue is that migrating postbooks would make postbooks-updater uninstallable on amd64. I have tried to add an easy hint to make Britney migrate postbooks together with postbooks-updater (without having checked if it will work). If it does not migrate tonight, we will revisit it. Please note that the migration mails are set only once a day (next in 22 hours from now), so please use dak or rmadision if you want to know before then. Thanks, ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature