[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#798589: marked as done (s3ql: please allow migration to testing)

Your message dated Thu, 10 Sep 2015 21:08:47 +0100
with message-id <20150910200847.GH3691@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#798589: s3ql: please allow migration to testing
has caused the Debian Bug report #798589,
regarding s3ql: please allow migration to testing
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
798589: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=798589
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hello,

The s3ql package is not migrating to testing. As far as I understand,
this is because it's not building on armhf.

However, I think it would be a lot better to have s3ql in testing for
the other archituctures than not to have it in testing at all (there is
no S3QL version in testing at the moment).

Is this intended behavior?

If so, is there a way to make an exception here and allow migration?

Thanks!
-Nikolaus

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Thu, Sep 10, 2015 at 01:00:27PM -0700, Nikolaus Rath wrote:
> The s3ql package is not migrating to testing. As far as I understand,
> this is because it's not building on armhf.

Your analysis is correct.

> However, I think it would be a lot better to have s3ql in testing for
> the other archituctures than not to have it in testing at all (there is
> no S3QL version in testing at the moment).
> 
> Is this intended behavior?

I'm not sure which behaviour you're asking about; the intended (and
correct, and visible) behaviour is to remove s3ql from testing because it
has an RC bug.
 
> If so, is there a way to make an exception here and allow migration?

It's not an exception, but if you want to not ship s3ql on armhf in Stretch
you can ask ftp-masters to remove it from sid, taking into account any
reverse dependencies.


-- 
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: