Hi RT, On Tue, Aug 04, 2015 at 06:14:56PM +0100, Iain Lane wrote: > user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > usertag 791212 + transition > block 791212 by 790756 > reassign 791212 release.debian.org > tags 791212 + patch > thanks > > On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 01:13:01PM +0000, Matthias Klose wrote: > > […] > > - If a library transition is needed, please prepare for the change. > > Rename the library package, append "v5" to the name of the package > > (e.g. libfoo2 -> libfoo2v5). Such a change can be avoided, if you > > have a soversion bump and you upload this version instead of the > > renamed package. Prepare a patch and attach it to this issue (mark > > this issue with patch), so that it is possible to NMU such a > > package. We'll probably have more than hundred transitions > > triggered. Then reassign the issue to release.debian.org and > > properly tag it as a transition issue, by sending an email to > > control@bugs.debian.org: > > Here's a diff for this, as uploaded to Ubuntu. Julien pinged me about this and I NMUed it. I think I read the above instructions as telling me to attach a patch and not upload so that someone else could pick it up and upload it at the right time. I might have done this with other bugs too - let me know if you find any and I'm happy to NMU. Unless I did something wrong, this package doesn't have any rdeps in the archive so I guess you can just close this bug once the binaries are NEWed. Thanks! -- Iain Lane [ iain@orangesquash.org.uk ] Debian Developer [ laney@debian.org ] Ubuntu Developer [ laney@ubuntu.com ]
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature