Bug#796598: marked as done (nmu: wmail_2.0-3, wmdate_0.7-4)
Your message dated Fri, 04 Sep 2015 07:14:46 -0400
with message-id <55E97D26.5030801@piedmont.edu>
and subject line wmail and wmdate will need source uploads after all
has caused the Debian Bug report #796598,
regarding nmu: wmail_2.0-3, wmdate_0.7-4
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
796598: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=796598
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Hello!
A new version of the libdockapp package was recently updated to sid. It
includes a SO version bump, and so its reverse dependencies should depend on
libdockapp3 instead of libdockapp2. See the auto-libdockapp transition [1].
Therefore, I would like to request binNMUs for wmail and wmdate. Note that
a binNMU for a third reverse dependency, wmacpi, is unnecessary, as a new source
upload is imminent.
Thank you!
Doug Torrance
[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libdockapp.html
nmu wmail_2.0-3 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against the new libdockapp."
nmu wmdate_0.7-4 . ALL . -m "Rebuild against the new libdockapp."
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
I had neglected to notice that libdockapp's headers move into a new
directory, and so these two packages will FTBFS if build with the
current source packages. New source uploads will be needed instead.
I'll file the appropriate bugs.
Closing this request. Sorry for the noise!
--- End Message ---
Reply to: