[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#702278: marked as done (pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8)

Your message dated Sat, 29 Aug 2015 16:36:01 +0200
with message-id <20150829143601.GE3107@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#702278: busybox upload
has caused the Debian Bug report #702278,
regarding pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
702278: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=702278
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Hi,
please unblock busybox 1:1.20.0-8. It fixes CVE-2013-1813

(Includes a udeb)

Cheers,
        Moritz

unblock busybox/1:1.20.0-8

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.0
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=de_DE.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=de_DE.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Mon, Sep 30, 2013 at 00:09:15 +0200, Cyril Brulebois wrote:

> Control: tag -1 -confirmed
> 
> Michael Tokarev <mjt@tls.msk.ru> (2013-05-09):
> > Control: reopen -1
> > 
> > 05.05.2013 12:00, Michael Tokarev wrote:
> > > Control: retitle -1 pu: busybox/1:1.20.0-8
> > 
> > Hmm.  I didn't notice the bug has been closed...
> > Reopening it (now re-titled as a pu), instead of
> > submiting a new report, so that all the information
> > is in one place.
> > 
> > Thanks, and sorry for all the noize.
> > 
> > /mjt
> 
> For the record, I think I would like to see some automated d-i
> non-regression tests implemented before touching busybox in stable.
> 
> Spending more time with -release@ stuff those days, but still spending
> some with -boot@, so hopefully we're getting those $some_day.
> 
This wheezy update is probably not happening anymore, closing the bug.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: