Bug#791046: getfem++ and GCC 5 transition
I would then propose only to upload the so-name
change with the current version to fix the transition
issue. The newer 5.0 version can go to experimental
to properly check all rdepends.
Anton
2015-08-23 22:14 GMT+02:00 Scott Howard <showard314@gmail.com>:
> On Sun, Aug 23, 2015 at 3:58 PM, Anton Gladky <gladk@debian.org> wrote:
>> Hi Scott,
>>
>> thanks for the pushing it.
>> I think there is no need to upload it into experimental, let`s
>> upload it directly into unstable. The only problem is that
>> there is already a newer version of getfem than in our git, 5.0.
>> So I do not think there is a need to push the previous
>> svn-version.
>
>
> Hi Anton, I was just writing you about this, thanks for catching it earlier
> The push to experimental was to get the new package name through the
> NEW queue, trigger an auto-transition tracker, and give time for you
> to review changes without changing the library interface. I haven't
> tested reverse-depends against libgetfem5++ so I'm not comfortable
> enough with this library to bump the soversion. But you're right, it
> would be ideal to do push the version released last month if possible.
> Cheers,
> Scott
Reply to: