Re: Bug#791301: transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)

To: 791301@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#791301: transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)
From: Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org>
Date: Sun, 16 Aug 2015 01:02:03 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 20150816000157.GA20798@perpetual.pseudorandom.co.uk>
In-reply-to: <20150811212606.GA22172@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
References: <20150811212606.GA22172@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>

retitle 791301 transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)
reassign 791301 release.debian.org
block 791301 by 790756
severity 791301 normal
forwarded 791301 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ticcutils.html
user release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
usertag 791301 + transition
thanks

On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 at 22:26:06 +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> I've prepared an NMU for ticcutils (versioned as 0.7-2.1)

This has reached unstable and built everywhere. I believe it's ready for
the first round of binNMUs.

    S

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Processed: Re: Bug#791301: transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)
  - From: owner@bugs.debian.org (Debian Bug Tracking System)

Prev by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#791161: librostlab-blast: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Next by Date: Processed: Re: Bug#791301: transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)
Previous by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#791161: librostlab-blast: library transition may be needed when GCC 5 is the default
Next by thread: Processed: Re: Bug#791301: transition: ticcutils (libticcutils2v5)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread