[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#791209: Patched muparser for gcc 5 transitio



On Fri, Aug 14, 2015 at 4:05 AM, Simon McVittie <smcv@debian.org> wrote:
> On Tue, 11 Aug 2015 at 18:47:58 -0400, Scott Howard wrote:
>> Package renamed to libmuparser2v5.
>> See patch:
>> http://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/debian-science/packages/muparser.git/patch/?id=5fb47ad4af6a7e4cdddbb078b7159d552c0e1f86
>
> This is unusual: you've changed the SONAME to libmuparser.so.2v5.
> For other packages in this transition, the approach that has been taken
> (as recommended in the mass bug filing) was to rename the *package* to
> libmuparser.so.2v5, but leave the SONAME at libmuparser.so.2.
>
> For instance, here's a similar change to liborigin2:
> <http://launchpadlibrarian.net/213540578/liborigin2_2%3A20110117-1build4_2%3A20110117-1ubuntu1.diff.gz>
> (Note that the lintian override in that patch is unnecessary in Debian;
> lintian has been changed to not complain about the v5 suffix.)
>
> Release team: is it a problem that the transition has been done differently
> in this way?

Thank you - this is my mistake, I modelled it after this NMU:
https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?att=1;filename=libbitcoin.nmu.debdiff;bug=791092;msg=19
Which I originally thought bumped the SONAME as well. We can restore
it before upload to unstable.
~Scott


Reply to: