|
On 13/07/2015 12:50, sebastic wrote: > On 2015-07-13 13:40, Alastair McKinstry wrote: >> So, whats the current status of the netCDF transition? > > We still need to verify all reverse dependencies before we can request a transition slot. > Ok, I'll start with my packages then. Experimental builds. >> What about collisions with the gcc-5 transition? > > The GCC-5 related transitions are going to be painful, that's why I hope to get the gdal & spatialite transitions done before GCC-5, but it seems unlikely. > Yes. This gets confusing. I have a package libdap, upon which gdal depends. Its just undergone a transition 3.12 -> 3.14.0 that included SONAME changes. It has two rdepends, gdal and grads. I had set an RC bug against libdap to block it from transitioning until g++-5 transition (as it has c++11 symbol changes) but its been removed and libdap 3.14.0 has transitioned. gdal has been binNMU'd and will transition. So what happens? Does testing get rebuilt with g++-5 ? (unlikely, but a good idea, I think), or is another transition necessary for libdapclient6 -> libdapclient6v5 with the g++ transition? Regards Alastair > Kind Regards, > > Bas -- Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written. |