[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#789077: transition: ruby2.2



On 2015-06-17 17:26, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
Hi,

On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 05:02:24PM +0100, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
Control: tag -1 moreinfo

On 2015-06-17 16:08, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
>This transition will be used to track which packages need to be rebuilt
>with Ruby 2.2 suport before we make it the default. Ruby 2.1 is still
>supported, and only after 2.2 becomes the default we will start another
>transition to phase 2.1 out.

Please stage the transition in experimental first, and come back when it's
clearer what needs to be done.

We already know what needs to be done, since the transitions from 1.9 to
2.0 and from 2.0 to 2.1 were done in a very similar way. We do the
transition in phases so that unstable is never broken:

Right, I didn't appreciate from your mail that's it is to be a two-pronged transition or that ruby2.2 is already in waiting in testing.

You'll tangle with the ongoing hiredis transition but we can sort that out later.

Scheduled first round of binNMUs.

--
Jonathan Wiltshire                                      jmw@debian.org
Debian Developer                         http://people.debian.org/~jmw

4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC  74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51

<directhex> i have six years of solaris sysadmin experience, from
            8->10. i am well qualified to say it is made from bonghits
			layered on top of bonghits


Reply to: