[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#786595: marked as done (transition: x265)

Your message dated Wed, 03 Jun 2015 10:15:25 +0200
with message-id <556EB79D.9050503@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#786595: transition: x265
has caused the Debian Bug report #786595,
regarding transition: x265
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786595: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786595
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html

libx265 bumped its SONAME from libx265-51 to libx265-59 and requires a
transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
Since all reverse dependencies are also involved in the x264 transition, I'd
suggest to do x265 at the same time as x264.

Cheers


Ben file:

title = "x265";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libx265-51" | .depends ~ "libx265-59";
is_good = .depends ~ "libx265-59";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libx265-51";
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 23/05/15 15:05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2015-05-23 14:45:25, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 23/05/15 13:19, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>> Severity: normal
>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>> Usertags: transition
>>> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-x265.html
>>>
>>> libx265 bumped its SONAME from libx265-51 to libx265-59 and requires a
>>> transition. All four reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
>>> Since all reverse dependencies are also involved in the x264 transition, I'd
>>> suggest to do x265 at the same time as x264.
>>
>> Let's do this.
> 
> Thanks, uploaded.

This is finished now.

Cheers,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: