[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#786466: marked as done (transition: ffms2)

Your message dated Mon, 01 Jun 2015 12:40:39 +0200
with message-id <556C36A7.6070903@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#786466: transition: ffms2
has caused the Debian Bug report #786466,
regarding transition: ffms2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
786466: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=786466
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

libffms2 bumped its SONAME to libffms2-4 and requires a transition. All three
reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.

x264 is one the reverse dependencies and is also waiting for a transition slot.
Maybe we can do these two transitions together?


Ben file:

title = "ffms2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libffms2-3" | .depends ~ "libffms2-4";
is_good = .depends ~ "libffms2-4";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libffms2-3";


Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 23/05/15 14:25, Jonathan Wiltshire wrote:
> On Sat, May 23, 2015 at 01:13:34PM +0200, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>
>> On 22/05/15 02:05, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>> On 2015-05-22 01:31:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>>> On 22/05/15 00:11, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>>> Package: release.debian.org
>>>>> Severity: normal
>>>>> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
>>>>> Usertags: transition
>>>>>
>>>>> libffms2 bumped its SONAME to libffms2-4 and requires a transition. All three
>>>>> reverse dependencies build fine against the new version.
>>>>>
>>>>> x264 is one the reverse dependencies and is also waiting for a transition slot.
>>>>> Maybe we can do these two transitions together?
>>>>
>>>> Maybe.
>>>>
>>>> But first upload to experimental to clear the NEW queue. Then come back to us.
>>>
>>> It's already through NEW.
>>
>> Ah good. Please go ahead and upload to unstable.
> 
> It was uploaded, so binNMUs scheduled.

And this is done now.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: