[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#785713: jessie-pu: package blackbox/0.70.1-23



On Sat, 23 May 2015 09:28:39 +0100
"Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> wrote:

> On Tue, 2015-05-19 at 16:34 -0300, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >  
> > > On 2015-05-19 14:34, Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto wrote:
> > > > The user report a bug[0] and pointed to a patch that
> > > > fixes it. The patch is already in sid (0.70.1-28).
> > > > QA upload.
> > > > 
> > > > As the user said: "The bug affects every day usage in
> > > > a most tangible way."
> > > > 
> > > > [0] - https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=784955
> > > > 
> > > 
> > > The patch looks fine in isolation, but please could we have a source 
> > > debdiff of a package built and tested on jessie, and versioned as 
> > > 0.70.1-23+deb8u1, for final confirmation?
> > > 
> > 
> > Package builded and tested. Looks ok.
> > 
> > Attached, blackbox.debdiff.
> 
> Thanks.
> 
> Could you provide a little more detail as to why this change is
> included?
> 
> +  * debian/clean: Added compile file.

The package doesn't compile two times in sequence with this 
file. When you run 'debuild' for the second time, it complain
about changes in the orig (upstream). It is not a really 
necessary change. The user who wants to build the package can
read the error message and remove the file himself. The change
is just to give some comfort for who wants to build the package.

> 
> I can see that it's previously been included in an upload to unstable,
> but the debdiff between the current stable and unstable packages does
> not show the {in,ex}clusion of that file. (As a side note, the unstable
> changelog also mentions "debian/libbt0.install: updated." but the diff
> shows no changes to that file.)
> 

The 'debian/libbt0.install: updated' was made in version 0.70.1-25 by
Eriberto. He is my mentor. I really don't remember. It was about a month
ago. The version in sid is 0.70.1-28 now.


regards,
-- 
Herbert Parentes Fortes Neto (hpfn)


Reply to: