Bug#779878: nmu: binutils-z80_4 binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 binutils-arm-none-eabi_5 possibly others
On 05/03/15 22:45, Ansgar Burchardt wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
>
> Hi,
>
> as I saw binutils_2.25-5 got unblocked, I was wondering weather the
> binutils-* packages built from binutils-source should be rebuilt
> aginst the new version targeting Jessie?
>
> There are binutils-{z80,mingw-w64,arm-none-eabi} currently in the
> archive and built against older versions of binutils (cf. [1]).
>
> The gcc-{arm-non-eabi,mingw-w64} packages are in the same situation,
> so are gdb-{arm-none-eabi,avr,mingw-w64} (though for some of the
> latter only the Debian revision of gdb changed).
>
> Finally there's also gnat-4.9.
>
> nmu binutils-z80_4 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5."
> nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5."
> nmu binutils-arm-none-eabi_5 . ALL . -m "Rebuilt against binutils 2.25-5."
These three happened in time for jessie.
gnat-4.9 didn't. It was built against gcc-4.9_4.9.2-2, but we only ship
gcc4-.9_4.9.2-10 in stable AFAICS. That seems odd.
I haven't checked gcc-*. Is this such an issue that we should do the binNMUs for
stable?
Cheers,
Emilio
Reply to: