[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#785376: transition: nettle

On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 16:16:25 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote:

> On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote:
> > Why does nettle not version its symbols?  For such a low level library
> > (especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a
> > fairly major oversight.
> It does now, albeit perhaps not quite properly. (I have tried to explain to 
> upstream how you don't base the symbol versions on the SONAME, but in practice 
> I guess the important thing is that two incompatible symbols don't have the 
> same version string.)
Ah, good.  I was looking at the version in jessie, which does not.


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: