On Fri, May 15, 2015 at 16:16:25 +0200, Magnus Holmgren wrote: > On Fri 15 May 2015 15.53.43, Julien Cristau wrote: > > Why does nettle not version its symbols? For such a low level library > > (especially one that seems to break its ABI regularly) that seems like a > > fairly major oversight. > > It does now, albeit perhaps not quite properly. (I have tried to explain to > upstream how you don't base the symbol versions on the SONAME, but in practice > I guess the important thing is that two incompatible symbols don't have the > same version string.) > Ah, good. I was looking at the version in jessie, which does not. Thanks, Julien
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature