Your message dated Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:11:06 +0100 with message-id <20150423211106.GE22595@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> and subject line Re: Bug#782681: unblock: cpio-doc/2.11-1 has caused the Debian Bug report #782681, regarding unblock: cpio-doc/2.11-1 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 782681: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782681 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: unblock: cpio-doc/2.11-1
- From: Wookey <wookey@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Apr 2015 03:00:34 +0100
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20150416020034.2452.44380.reportbug@cheddar.halon.org.uk>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Please unblock package cpio-doc This is a bit of a long shot, but if you are minded it would be a good thing. Sledge told me to file this in case you see fit as RMs to include it. due to #695717, the info pages for cpio were removed. (see #704121) cpio is very hard to use without its info pages as the options are cryptic in the extreme, and the (included) man page is minimal (crucially not explaining all the options). So I made a cpio-doc page to include the info page, just like tar-doc (from which the packaging was stolen). It would be very nice if jessie had a cpio-doc package to go with its cpio package so that people could actually use cpio. But of course that makes this a new package at a very late stage(!) But then it's a doc-package in non-free so very harmless. Anyway, if you like the idea and are able to fast-track it in, I'm sure a lot of people would thnk you. Otherwise no worries - it's at least done for unstable. unblock cpio-doc/2.11-1 -- System Information: Debian Release: 7.8 APT prefers stable-updates APT policy: (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'stable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Wookey <wookey@debian.org>, 782681-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#782681: unblock: cpio-doc/2.11-1
- From: Jonathan Wiltshire <jmw@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2015 22:11:06 +0100
- Message-id: <20150423211106.GE22595@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20150416020034.2452.44380.reportbug@cheddar.halon.org.uk>
- References: <[🔎] 20150416020034.2452.44380.reportbug@cheddar.halon.org.uk>
Control: tag -1 wontfix On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 03:00:34AM +0100, Wookey wrote: > Please unblock package cpio-doc > > This is a bit of a long shot, but if you are minded it would be a good > thing. Sledge told me to file this in case you see fit as RMs to > include it. > > due to #695717, the info pages for cpio were removed. (see #704121) > cpio is very hard to use without its info pages as the options are > cryptic in the extreme, and the (included) man page is minimal > (crucially not explaining all the options). > > So I made a cpio-doc page to include the info page, just like tar-doc > (from which the packaging was stolen). This can't make it before things are switched off; sorry. Backport might be fruitful, or possibly p-u, but please look at that after release and once NEW is processed. -- Jonathan Wiltshire jmw@debian.org Debian Developer http://people.debian.org/~jmw 4096R: 0xD3524C51 / 0A55 B7C5 1223 3942 86EC 74C3 5394 479D D352 4C51Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---