Hi, On Mittwoch, 15. April 2015, Niels Thykier wrote: > As mentioned over IRC, it seems we are unable to schedule these binNMUs > for technical reasons. for those wondering: (posted here with permissions...) <nthykier> buxy: Re: binNMUs in squeeze-lts - looks like a "no-can-do" <nthykier> the libxrender one gives me "W: can't get version info for libxrender/amd64" <nthykier> (repeat for i386) <adsb> yeah, you can't binNMU things in a suite that doesn't contain source for them <adsb> (or in a suite that they're an overlay for, which is how *-pu work) <buxy> and if we build them in squeeze, will the build chroot have squeeze- lts? <buxy> (assuming we can poke some ftpmaster to clear squeeze-pu afterwards) <adsb> I don't know <buxy> thanks, taking it over to #debian-buildd <ansgar> adsb: squeeze-lts should behave like p-u in that regard, i.e. it is an overlay over squeeze for dak. <adsb> ansgar: fair enough, I hadn't looked at the detail on the ftp-master side. it sounds like that's not how it's implemented in w-b though <adsb> oh, umm, nvm <adsb> you mean binNMUing in "squeeze" should work <ansgar> adsb: Wouldn't that upload to oldstable-p-u (and get rejected)? <ansgar> I don't know how w-b handles oldstable-p-u vs. -lts. <adsb> yeah. cheers, Holger
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.