[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#782572: marked as done (RM: sugar-presence-srvice-0.84/0.84.3-1.1, sugar-presence-service-0.88/0.88.0-3.1, sugar-presence-service-0.90/0.90.2-1, src:sugar-toolkit-0.96/0.96.3-1)



Your message dated Tue, 14 Apr 2015 19:02:46 +0200
with message-id <20150414170246.GA23578@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#782572: RM: sugar-presence-srvice-0.84/0.84.3-1.1, sugar-presence-service-0.88/0.88.0-3.1, sugar-presence-service-0.90/0.90.2-1, src:sugar-toolkit-0.96/0.96.3-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #782572,
regarding RM: sugar-presence-srvice-0.84/0.84.3-1.1, sugar-presence-service-0.88/0.88.0-3.1, sugar-presence-service-0.90/0.90.2-1, src:sugar-toolkit-0.96/0.96.3-1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
782572: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=782572
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Sugar is severely broken (see bug#782414) and not suitable for Jessie.

Please drop *all* sugar packages for Jessie.

In addition to the directly affected packages listed in subject, please
also drop all of its reverse (build-)dependencies, and libraries with no
reverse dependencies besides those of dropped packages.

Here is a complete list of packages to drop:

src:python-aiml/0.8.6-2
src:python-elements/0.13+svn20090823.230+dfsg-2
src:python-xklavier/0.4-4
src:sugar-0.96/0.96.1-2.1
src:sugar-0.98/0.98.8-1
src:sugar-artwork-0.84/0.84.4-3
src:sugar-artwork-0.88/0.88.1-4
src:sugar-artwork-0.96/0.96.2-2
src:sugar-artwork-0.98/0.98.4-1
src:sugar-base-0.84/0.84.2-4
src:sugar-base-0.88/0.88.0-4
src:sugar-base-0.96/0.96.0-1
src:sugar-base-0.98/0.98.0-1
src:sugar-datastore-0.84/0.84.1-3.1
src:sugar-datastore-0.88/0.88.0-4
src:sugar-datastore-0.96/0.96.0-1
src:sugar-datastore-0.98/0.98.1-1
src:sugar-presence-srvice-0.84/0.84.3-1.1
src:sugar-presence-service-0.88/0.88.0-3.1
src:sugar-presence-service-0.90/0.90.2-1
src:sugar-toolkit-0.96/0.96.3-1
src:sugar-toolkit-gtk3/0.98.7-1
src:sugar-toolkit-0.88/0.88.1-4
src:sugar-toolkit-0.84/0.84.17-1
src:sugar-toolkit-0.98/0.98.1-1
sugar-terminal-activity/28-1.2
sugar-record-activity/82-1.2
sugar-pippy-activity/46~dfsg-2
sugar-physics-activity/7+dfsg-1.2
sugar-moon-activity/11-1.1
sugar-memorize-activity/35-1.1
sugar-log-activity/24-1.1
sugar-irc-activity/8-1.2
sugar-connect-activity/22-1.2
sugar-chat-activity-0.84/65-5.1
sugar-calculate-activity/40-2
sugar-browse-activity/137-1
sugar-etoys-activity/116-3

One additional reverse dependency - education-desktop-sugar - is part of
a larger set of binary packages and thus need special care (see
bug#782504):  This should be solved by an upload tonight.

One other package - sugar-turtleart-activity - arguably should be
dropped as well, but it is maintained outside of the Sugar/OLPC team and
do not declare any tight relationships with infrastructural Sugar
packages so a) do not technically affect dropping Sugar, and b) possibly
is indeed usable on its own - i.e. if not then that's an independent bug.

Regards,

 - Jonas

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=6p3C
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Hi Jonas,

On Tue, Apr 14, 2015 at 12:59:16PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Sugar is severely broken (see bug#782414) and not suitable for Jessie.
> 
> Please drop *all* sugar packages for Jessie.
> 
> In addition to the directly affected packages listed in subject, please
> also drop all of its reverse (build-)dependencies, and libraries with no
> reverse dependencies besides those of dropped packages.
> 
> Here is a complete list of packages to drop:

Added all of these (with 2 typos fixed). We'll see if britney is happy to
remove them at the next run.

Cheers,

Ivo

--- End Message ---

Reply to: