[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781274: unblock: owncloud/7.0.4+dfsg-3



Control: retitle -1 unblock: owncloud/7.0.4+dfsg-3

Hi,

On Thu, Mar 26, 2015 at 03:26:37PM -0400, David Prévot wrote:

> Please pre-approve an unblock for the owncloud package

Let’s make it an approval request instead: I felt uneasy letting a
package with known security issues (and fixes) in unstable, so I went
ahead with the upload. It should save us a hop if you agree with the
request, and I’ll make sure to prepare a -4 version in a timely manner
if you disagree with any of the proposed changes.

unblock owncloud/7.0.4+dfsg-3

Thanks in advance.

Regards

P.-S.: Original request (without debdiff)

> It cherry-picks three security fixes from the recently released 7.0.5
> version (already in experimental):
> 
> owncloud (7.0.4+dfsg-3) unstable; urgency=medium
> 
>   * Add gbp config file to follow the jessie branch
>   * Backport security fixes from 7.0.5:
>     - Multiple stored XSS in "contacts" application [OC-SA-2015-001]
>     - Multiple stored XSS in "documents" application [OC-SA-2015-002]
>     - Bypass of file blacklist [OC-SA-2015-004]
>   * Run upgrade script with sudo as www-data user
>   * Depend on php5-cli (it is actually used in postinst)
> 
>  -- David Prévot <taffit@debian.org>  Wed, 25 Mar 2015 16:20:32 -0400
> 
> I’d also like to shim in two other small changes:
> - the upgrade script should be run as the same user as the installed
>   data, i.e., www-data by default, instead of root: this recommendation
>   has recently been enforced upstream since the upgrade process may
>   touch data files on top of the potential database changes;
> - since the php CLI is called during postinst, php5-cli should be a
>   dependency instead of a recommendation (the README.Debian change just
>   drops the now useless explanation why php5-cli was recommended).
> 
> The attached debdiff stripes away the webodf.js changes from the
> cherry-picked commit from upstream: this minified JavaScript files is
> anyway regenerated at build time and is thus not the file included in
> the actual binary package.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


Reply to: