[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#781529: marked as done (release.debian.org: unblock noweb 2.11b-9)



Your message dated Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:52:51 +0100
with message-id <1427835171.1708.41.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Re: Bug#781529: release.debian.org: unblock noweb 2.11b-9
has caused the Debian Bug report #781529,
regarding release.debian.org: unblock noweb 2.11b-9
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
781529: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=781529
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

I would like to upload noweb 2.11b-9 to fix #781099, which although was
filed as "important", I think qualifies for "grave" ("makes the package
in question unusable or mostly so" -- at least on the affected
architectures), or "serious" ("in the package maintainer's or release
manager's opinion, makes the package unsuitable for release" -- being
broken on so many architectures should probably be considered unsuitable
for release).  But I'm leaving it as "important" for now, and will allow
the release team to determine whether it is RC or not.

The diff is just a one-line change (not including the changelog entry),
and just does a touch on a file, since the build process is sensitive to
timestamps.  Here is the interdiff between -8 and -9.

diff -u noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog
--- noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog
+++ noweb-2.11b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+noweb (2.11b-9) unstable; urgency=low
+
+  * debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch: Add src/shell/noweave to the list of touched
+    files. (Closes: #781099)
+
+ -- Hubert Chathi <uhoreg@debian.org>  Fri, 27 Mar 2015 22:06:25 -0400
+
 noweb (2.11b-8) unstable; urgency=low
 
   * debian/control:
diff -u noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
--- noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
+++ noweb-2.11b/debian/patches/99_touch.dpatch
@@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
   -patch)
      sleep 1 # so that we have at least a second difference in timestaps
      for x in src/shell/tmac.w \
+           src/shell/noweave \
            src/shell/noroff \
            src/shell/toroff \
 	   src/xdoc/notangle.1 \

The debdiff is empty, other than the version number change:

File lists identical (after any substitutions)

Control files of package noweb: lines which differ (wdiff format)
-----------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-2.11b-8-] {+2.11b-9+}

Control files of package nowebm: lines which differ (wdiff format)
------------------------------------------------------------------
Version: [-2.11b-8-] {+2.11b-9+}


FYI, there is a bit of a complication in that I only have I can't upload
any more with my 1024D key, and my 4096R key isn't trusted enough to be
used for uploading, so I will need to find a sponsor to do the upload.

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.2
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (990, 'stable'), (500, 'stable-updates'), (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.17-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_CA.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_CA.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Tue, 2015-03-31 at 16:09 -0400, Hubert Chathi wrote:
> tags 781529 - moreinfo
> thanks
> 
> On Tue, 31 Mar 2015 07:41:56 +0100, "Adam D. Barratt" <adam@adam-barratt.org.uk> said:
> 
> > Please go ahead, and remove the "moreinfo" tag once the package is in
> > unstable.
> 
> Done.  (Hopefully I did that right.)

Yep. :-)

Unblocked.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---

Reply to: