[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#775309: marked as done (nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_5.1)

Your message dated Tue, 31 Mar 2015 21:15:10 +0200
with message-id <20150331211510.2b9a1b31@heffalump.sk2.org>
and subject line Re: nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_5.1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775309,
regarding nmu: binutils-mingw-w64_5.1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
775309: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775309
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Dear release team,

My earlier binNMU in wheezy-security wasn't appropriate, but
binutils-mingw-w64 still needs fixing in jessie and sid, and I'm
wondering whether to do sourceful uploads or request binNMUs.

If binNMUs are OK, there won't be any trouble with inappropriate
versions of binutils-source ending up being used in jessie; otherwise
I suppose I'll need to do a source upload to jessie-p-u (so it picks
up binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1 from jessie) as well as sid (which will
pick up binutils 2.25-3)...

nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . -m "Rebuild for DSA-2013-2 (CVE-2014-8484, CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503, CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738)."
nmu binutils-mingw-w64_5.1 . ALL . jessie-proposed-updates . -m "Rebuild for DSA-2013-2 (CVE-2014-8484, CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502, CVE-2014-8503, CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738)."

Regards,

Stephen


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On Tue, 13 Jan 2015 23:01:30 +0100, Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org> wrote:
> My earlier binNMU in wheezy-security wasn't appropriate, but
> binutils-mingw-w64 still needs fixing in jessie and sid, and I'm
> wondering whether to do sourceful uploads or request binNMUs.

And this is no longer necessary given that 5.2 is in jessie and sid with the
appropriate fixes!

Regards,

Stephen

Attachment: pgpkjgu9jNfG1.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: