[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#780130: unblock (pre-approval): python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3



Control: tags -1 confirmed moreinfo

On 2015-03-09 16:11, Mike Gabriel wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please consider unblocking planned upload of package python-x2go.
> 
> I skimmed through python-x2go upstream Git and considered the below
> patches important enough to attempt for an unblock request.
> 
> +  * debian/patches:
> +    + Add 0003_use-correct-loglevel-WARN.patch. Use the proper
> +      log.loglevel_WARN expression (instead of undefined
> +      log.loglevel_WARNING). Upstream patch needed
> +      rebasing and a modification to apply correctly. (Closes: #780128).
> 
> -> Cherry-picked from upstream. Prevent python-x2go from throwing
> exceptions due to flaw in log message calls.
> 

NB: There is a typo in the patch description s/logolevel/loglevel/

> +    + Update 0001_catch-connection-exception-during-session-startup.patch.
> +      Fix expression errors in two Python exceptions. (Closes: #780125).
> 
> -> I should have paid more attention here, in the first place. The issue
> got fixed upstream way back already, but I forgot to provide the fix in
> Debian (until today).
> 
> +    + Add 0005_fix-password-auth-if-keys-have-passphrase.patch. Fix password
> +      authentication in pyhoca-cli if people have default SSH keys locked with
> +      a passphrase. (Closes: #780127).
> 
> -> Nasty issue if people use pyhoca-cli (X2Go command line client) and
> have locked SSH private keys. PyHoca-CLI won't stop trying to unlock the
> SSH key instead of using the interactively provide password for normal
> username/password SSH authentication.
> 
> 
> light+love,
> Mike
> 
> 
> (include/attach the debdiff against the package in testing)
> 
> unblock python-x2go/0.5.0.1-3
> 
> [...]

Ack, please upload this to unstable and remove the moreinfo tag once it
has been accepted.

~Niels


Reply to: