[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#779959: unblock: binutils-mingw-w64/5.2 (pre-upload)



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

I would like to update binutils-mingw-w64, to rebuild against binutils
2.25 with the security fixes for DSA-2013. The debdiff is as follows:

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index ae48239..3ea00d4 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+binutils-mingw-w64 (5.2) unstable; urgency=high
+
+  * Rebuild against binutils 2.24.90.20141023-1 or later to fix
+    CVE-2014-8484, CVE-2014-8485, CVE-2014-8501, CVE-2014-8502,
+    CVE-2014-8503, CVE-2014-8504, CVE-2014-8737, CVE-2014-8738 (Closes:
+    #775165).
+
+ -- Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>  Mon, 12 Jan 2015 22:32:41 +0100
+
 binutils-mingw-w64 (5.1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Increase the testsuite timeout (the build fails on mipsel otherwise).
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index 823521d..e90012a 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ Source: binutils-mingw-w64
 Section: devel
 Priority: extra
 Maintainer: Stephen Kitt <skitt@debian.org>
-Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, binutils-source (>= 2.22), bison, flex, dejagnu
+Build-Depends: debhelper (>= 7.0.50~), autotools-dev, binutils-source (>= 2.24.90.20141023-1), bison, flex, dejagnu
 Standards-Version: 3.9.5
 Homepage: http://www.gnu.org/software/binutils/
 Vcs-Git: git://anonscm.debian.org/collab-maint/binutils-mingw-w64.git


unblock binutils-mingw-w64/5.2

Regards,

Stephen

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 8.0
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (200, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.16.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/8 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: sysvinit (via /sbin/init)


Reply to: