Bug#775770: marked as done (unblock live-config/4.0.4-1)
Your message dated Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:04:29 +0100
with message-id <20150208210428.GD31969@ugent.be>
and subject line Re: Bug#775770: unblock live-config/4.0.4-1
has caused the Debian Bug report #775770,
regarding unblock live-config/4.0.4-1
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
775770: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775770
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock live-config/4.0.4-1.
Changes since 4.0.2-1 (jessie) are:
* Adding dbus to recommends for systemd backend.
* Temporarily running components without set -e.
* [man:ja] Fix a typo in po header.
--
Address: Daniel Baumann, Donnerbuehlweg 3, CH-3012 Bern
Email: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net
Internet: http://people.progress-technologies.net/~daniel.baumann/
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: daniel.baumann@progress-technologies.net, 775770-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#775770: unblock live-config/4.0.4-1
- From: Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 8 Feb 2015 22:04:29 +0100
- Message-id: <20150208210428.GD31969@ugent.be>
- In-reply-to: <54C3D5BE.1000309@progress-technologies.net>
- References: <54BD53BB.9050109@progress-technologies.net> <20150122133000.GF29173@lupin.home.powdarrmonkey.net> <54C3D5BE.1000309@progress-technologies.net>
Hi,
On Sat, Jan 24, 2015 at 06:26:22PM +0100, Daniel Baumann wrote:
> Subject: Bug#775770: unblock live-config/4.0.4-1
Unblocked.
Cheers,
Ivo
--- End Message ---
Reply to: