[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

question regarding unblock request for library



dear release team,

sorry for this untimely interrupt, i figure you are busy working on
getting jessie out.


summary: a *library* package (libassimp3) has been reported to have some
symbols dropped. this makes the library unusable in certain cases.
does this qualify for a unblock request?


longer explanation:
the dropped symbols are only with resp. to the accompanying header
files, not to older package versions. (so its not a soname-bump problem,
but a mismatch between headers and library).
the original reporter[1] was kind enough to report this with severity
"important" (thus not affecting the freeze), but i am wondering if the
severity should be escalated to "serious", due to the nature of libraries.
luckily, i am not aware of any packages that depend on this library
outside its source package, so the bug seems to not affect other
packages (their FTBFS would have flagged the underlying problem earlier).
otoh, the bug is still a bummer for anybody who wants to develop against
this library (like the bug reporter)

the fix is quite minimal, as it adds 1 (one) line to the version-script
used for tightening the exports, and 7 (seven) lines to the symbols-file
for the newly exported symbols.


if you could drop me a note whether i should keep pestering you with my
little problem or not, i would be thankful.



thanks for all the great work and making jessie the best debian ever!

fgamdsr
IOhannes



[1] https://bugs.debian.org/775890

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: