Bug#775393: marked as done (RM: interchange/5.7.7-2)
Your message dated Thu, 15 Jan 2015 07:36:04 +0100
with message-id <54B75FD4.1010009@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#775393: RM: interchange/5.7.7-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #775393,
regarding RM: interchange/5.7.7-2
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
775393: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=775393
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: rm
interchange-ui will not start without the Perl module Digest::SHA1
(Digest/SHA1.pm) installed. However, this Perl module is no longer in Debian.
The maintainer has said that this bug will be fixed in version 5.8.0, but this
was on 25 November 2013, and there has been no progress since. You can see more
information about this in #687904.
For this reason, I propose that interchange be removed from Debian.
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2015-01-15 04:33, Russ Allbery wrote:
> Riley <BM-2cVqnDuYbAU5do2DfJTrN7ZbAJ246S4Xix@bitmessage.ch> writes:
>
>> interchange-ui will not start without the Perl module Digest::SHA1
>> (Digest/SHA1.pm) installed. However, this Perl module is no longer in
>> Debian. The maintainer has said that this bug will be fixed in version
>> 5.8.0, but this was on 25 November 2013, and there has been no progress
>> since. You can see more information about this in #687904.
>
>> For this reason, I propose that interchange be removed from Debian.
>
> That's probably the right thing to do given that no one has worked on this
> for so long, but I wanted to note that this is a pretty trivial fix. I
> think replacing Digest::SHA1 with Digest::SHA is generally all that's
> needed.
>
Hi,
I have decided to add the removal hint despite the fact that the bug has
"only" been promoted to RC today.
Thanks,
~Niels
--- End Message ---
Reply to: