also sprach Ivo De Decker <ivodd@debian.org> [2015-01-14 21:58 +0100]: > I'm reluctant to allow this, as this essentially means dumping this new > version into jessie untested. I would prefer if it was just uploaded to > unstable (reverting the new upstream version there), to allow it to be tested > there, and migrate to jessie that way. If there is a good reason why this > isn't possible (if it introduces other issues in unstable by doing this), > please explain why and I'll consider allowing a t-p-u upload. It's my understanding that unstable contains a fixed non-new upstream version which could migrate to jessie now. Christian would still like to get p3 into jessie, but I agree that this should not happen without testing. So how about unblocking p2-1.1 and letting it into jessie, then uploading p3-1 to unstable and revisiting the issue in a few days? In the unlikely event that we need to push p2-1.2 or p2-2 to jessie, we would need to use t-p-u to bypass unstable. -- .''`. martin f. krafft <madduck@d.o> @martinkrafft : :' : proud Debian developer `. `'` http://people.debian.org/~madduck `- Debian - when you have better things to do than fixing systems
Attachment:
digital_signature_gpg.asc
Description: Digital signature (see http://martin-krafft.net/gpg/sig-policy/999bbcc4/current)