Op maandag 12 januari 2015 08:15:39 schreef Adam D. Barratt: > On Mon, 2015-01-12 at 06:47 +0100, Stephen Kitt wrote: > > binutils was recently updated in wheezy-security and wheezy-p-u to fix > > a number of security issues identified in DSA-3123-1; of these, a > > number concern binutils-mingw-w64 as well, so it would be great if it > > could be rebuilt in those suites... (It will pick up the patches from > > binutils-source.) > > We won't schedule binNMUs in -security for packages that DSAs haven't > been issued for, at least not without the security team's request / > agreement - it's just going to confuse everyone. This is not something we do very routinely, so I'd like to confirm: if these binNMU's are triggered for stable-security, do they still end up in the security-master queue so they can be released in a coordinated way? I think if so we can then send a -2 DSA announcing the availability of these packages (-2 because we 'normally' announce any such to-be-rebuilt packages in the same DSA -1 as the base package). Cheers, Thijs
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.