Bug#774819: unblock: neutron/2014.1.3-10
On 01/10/2015 01:06 PM, Ivo De Decker wrote:
> Hi Thomas,
>
> On Thu, Jan 08, 2015 at 12:17:47AM +0100, Thomas Goirand wrote:
>> Yet another patch that needs to enter Jessie.
>
> Closing this bug, as this upload has been superseded by yet another upload.
>
> Could you please make sure that the next unblock request(s) for your packages
> contain the remaining changes you want to get into jessie and that they are
> tested before you file an unblock request? Also, once packages are unblocked,
> it's preferable to let them migrate to jessie before uploading additional
> changes. This avoids the need to review the same changes again. Obviously
> this only applies if the unblocked version doesn't introduce new issues in
> jessie.
>
> If the number of uploads for these packages doesn't go down, it's unclear if
> these packages are suitable for a stable release.
>
> Cheers,
>
> Ivo
Hi Ivo,
Yes, I am sorry that I had to do some new uploads. I have found another
issue with openstack-pkg-tools and systemd. In fact, it's James Page
from Canonical who did (Canonical is also adopting openstack-pkg-tools
for their packaging of OpenStack): if using systemd, daemons were not
automatically started on the first install because dh_installinit was
called before dh_systemd_enable in the rules file. As a consequence, I
did another round of uploads. Then I have found some inconsistencies in
the whole OpenStack suite (like the <project>/configure_db flag having
different values and some more...), which I have fixed. There's also
some more bugs which were filled in the BTS which I fixed.
As you wrote above, I do prefer to run a new battery of test before
asking for unblocks. This will take a bit of time, and I will let you
know soon when I'm done.
I'm sorry if this is a bit late in the release process, and also to have
wasted some of your time, but I really hope to improve quality of the
packages here (while keeping changes as minimal as possible).
Cheers,
Thomas Goirand (zigo)
Reply to: