[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#767661: marked as done (openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie)

Your message dated Sat, 8 Nov 2014 15:38:03 +0000
with message-id <20141108153803.GF2077@betterave.cristau.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#767661: openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie
has caused the Debian Bug report #767661,
regarding openssl: new upstream release 1.0.2 for jessie
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
767661: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767661
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal

Hi,

I would like to upload the new upstream release of openssl 1.0.2
to unstable to get it into jessie.  I know I'm a little late with
this.  It's actually not released yet, but it should be real soon
now.  (It's been in experimental for a while.)

This version should be compatible with the 1.0.1 version.  I don't
expect anything to break moving from 1.0.1 to 1.0.2.

The main reason I want to have 1.0.2 in jessie is to be able to
support openssl for the lifetime of jessie.  1.0.1 will not be
supported for the lifetime of jessie, while 1.0.2 should be
supported long enough to even cover the TLS version of jessie
if there is going to be an LTS version.


Kurt

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Control: tag -1 wontfix

On Sat, Nov  1, 2014 at 20:08:34 +0100, Kurt Roeckx wrote:

> I would like to upload the new upstream release of openssl 1.0.2
> to unstable to get it into jessie.  I know I'm a little late with
> this.  It's actually not released yet, but it should be real soon
> now.  (It's been in experimental for a while.)
> 
It's too late for this, sorry.

Cheers,
Julien

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: