Your message dated Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:16:47 +0100 with message-id <20141103111647.GG8382@betterave.cristau.org> and subject line Re: Bug#767895: TPU binnmus for arm64 and ppc64el has caused the Debian Bug report #767895, regarding TPU binnmus for arm64 and ppc64el to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 767895: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767895 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: TPU binnmus for arm64 and ppc64el
- From: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>
- Date: Mon, 03 Nov 2014 11:08:42 +0000
- Message-id: <[🔎] 20141103110841.12577.53799.reportbug@localhost>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu When looking through the list of packages that are uninstallable in arm64 testing I belive the following TPU binnmus are appropriate towards the goal of pushing the list of uninstallable arch specific binaries in arm64 testing to zero. Looking further it seems seed could also do with a TPU binnmu on ppc64el. nmu openvpn_2.3.2-9 . arm64 . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' nmu cython_0.20.1+git90-g0e6e38e-1 . arm64 . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' nmu seed_3.2.0-2 . arm64 ppc64el . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' All of the above packages are needed as depedencies for packages already in arm64 testing and have newer upstream versions stuck in sid. -- System Information: Debian Release: 6.0.3 APT prefers oldstable-proposed-updates APT policy: (500, 'oldstable-proposed-updates'), (500, 'oldstable') Architecture: amd64 (x86_64) Kernel: Linux 2.6.32-5-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores) Locale: LANG=en_GB.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8) Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: peter green <plugwash@p10link.net>, 767895-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#767895: TPU binnmus for arm64 and ppc64el
- From: Julien Cristau <jcristau@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 3 Nov 2014 12:16:47 +0100
- Message-id: <20141103111647.GG8382@betterave.cristau.org>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20141103110841.12577.53799.reportbug@localhost>
- References: <[🔎] 20141103110841.12577.53799.reportbug@localhost>
On Mon, Nov 3, 2014 at 11:08:42 +0000, peter green wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > When looking through the list of packages that are uninstallable in arm64 > testing I belive the following TPU binnmus are appropriate towards the goal > of pushing the list of uninstallable arch specific binaries in arm64 testing > to zero. Looking further it seems seed could also do with a TPU binnmu on > ppc64el. > > nmu openvpn_2.3.2-9 . arm64 . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' > nmu cython_0.20.1+git90-g0e6e38e-1 . arm64 . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' Already scheduled. > nmu seed_3.2.0-2 . arm64 ppc64el . -m "build for testing" -d 'testing' > Will be fixed in meta-gnome3 by dropping the dep. Cheers, JulienAttachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
--- End Message ---