[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#767750: unblock: libnet-dns-perl/0.81-1



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Please unblock package libnet-dns-perl

Hi,

the version of libnet-dns-perl in unstable fixes some FTBFS errors in
other packages (#755317), so it's desired to have it in testing, but
it's a 0.81 pre-released version and the 0.80_2 version is causing
problems at least in spamassasssin (#766718).

libnet-dns-perl has undergone some big refactoring in between version
in stable and testing and last few upstream releases are just cleanups
of that refactoring (mainly packages using some Net::DNS internal they
shouldn't be using).

Unfortunatelly upstream missed the freeze-10 days a little bit, thus I
am asking for a permission to upload final 0.81 release and let it
migrate to testing.  Thank you for considering this.

Cheers,
Ondrej

Cleaned-up[1] upstream diff attached, diffstat is here:

$ diffstat /tmp/libnet-dns-perl-0.80.2-0.81.diff
 Packet.pm           |    8 ++++----
 Parameters.pm       |   18 +++++++++---------
 RR.pm               |    4 ++++
 RR/MX.pm            |    4 ++--
 RR/TSIG.pm          |    3 +--
 Resolver/Recurse.pm |    2 +-
 6 files changed, 21 insertions(+), 18 deletions(-)

unblock libnet-dns-perl/0.81-1

- -- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (700, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.2.0-4-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_DK.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_DK.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1
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=EraZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----


Reply to: