[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#767722: marked as done (unblock: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7)

Your message dated Sun, 02 Nov 2014 11:47:43 +0100
with message-id <54560BCF.8010301@thykier.net>
and subject line Re: Bug#767722: unblock: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7
has caused the Debian Bug report #767722,
regarding unblock: gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
767722: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=767722
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package gnustep-netclasses, it fixes RC bug #755514.

Debdiff attached.

unblock gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index a45be46..50c01e3 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,11 @@
+gnustep-netclasses (1.06.dfsg-7) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * debian/patches/NSUInteger-fixes.patch: New; fixes bug with joining a
+    channel on 64-bit architectures (Closes: #755514).
+  * debian/patches/series: Update.
+
+ -- Yavor Doganov <yavor@gnu.org>  Wed, 29 Oct 2014 17:56:36 +0200
+
 gnustep-netclasses (1.06.dfsg-6) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * debian/source/format: Switch to 3.0 (quilt).
diff --git a/debian/patches/NSUInteger-fixes.patch b/debian/patches/NSUInteger-fixes.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b3d90d5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/debian/patches/NSUInteger-fixes.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,61 @@
+Description: NSUInteger fixes for 64-bit platforms.
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/755514
+Origin: upstream, commit: r2540
+Last-Update: 2014-10-29
+---
+
+--- gnustep-netclasses.orig/Source/IRCObject.m
++++ gnustep-netclasses/Source/IRCObject.m
+@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
+ 	
+ #define NEXT_NON_SPACE(__y, __z, __string)\
+ {\
+-	int __len = [(__string) length];\
++	NSUInteger __len = [(__string) length];\
+ 	id set = [NSCharacterSet whitespaceCharacterSet];\
+ 	__z = (__y);\
+ 	while (__z < __len && \
+@@ -152,9 +152,9 @@
+ 
+ static inline NSString *get_IRC_prefix(NSString *line, NSString **prefix)
+ {
+-	int beg;
+-	int end;
+-	int len = [line length];
++	NSUInteger beg;
++	NSUInteger end;
++	NSUInteger len = [line length];
+ 	
+ 	if (len == 0)
+ 	{
+@@ -205,9 +205,9 @@
+ 	
+ static inline NSString *get_next_IRC_word(NSString *line, NSString **prefix)
+ {
+-	int beg;
+-	int end;
+-	int len = [line length];
++	NSUInteger beg;
++	NSUInteger end;
++	NSUInteger len = [line length];
+ 	
+ 	if (len == 0)
+ 	{
+@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
+ static void rec_part(IRCObject *client, NSString *command,
+                      NSString *prefix, NSArray *paramList)
+ {
+-	int x;
++	NSUInteger x;
+ 	
+ 	if (!prefix)
+ 	{	
+@@ -565,7 +565,7 @@
+                      NSArray *paramList)
+ {
+ 	NSArray *newParams;
+-	int x;
++	NSUInteger x;
+ 	
+ 	if (!prefix)
+ 	{
diff --git a/debian/patches/series b/debian/patches/series
index c354cf7..a4a526d 100644
--- a/debian/patches/series
+++ b/debian/patches/series
@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
+NSUInteger-fixes.patch
 gcc-warnings.patch
 fix-log-format.patch
 link-libs.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2014-11-02 07:27, Yavor Doganov wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Please unblock package gnustep-netclasses, it fixes RC bug #755514.
> 
> Debdiff attached.
> 
> unblock gnustep-netclasses/1.06.dfsg-7
> 

Hi,

Sorry, but I will have to decline your request.  The RC bug does not
affect testing (as the package is not in testing) and therefore not
applicable for neither ageing nor an unblock.

Yours truly,
~Niels

--- End Message ---
Reply to: