[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#757590: marked as done (nmu: xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11)

Your message dated Sun, 10 Aug 2014 16:00:43 +0200
with message-id <53E77B0B.6030601@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#757590: nmu: xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11
has caused the Debian Bug report #757590,
regarding nmu: xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
757590: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=757590
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
X-Debbugs-Cc: xdmf@packages.debian.org

It looks like xdmf was built in an unclean environment by the uploader.
It has a dependency on libhdf5-8 which is only available in
experimental. Please binNMU xdmf:

nmu xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in clean environment."

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 09/08/14 17:50, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> X-Debbugs-Cc: xdmf@packages.debian.org
> 
> It looks like xdmf was built in an unclean environment by the uploader.
> It has a dependency on libhdf5-8 which is only available in
> experimental. Please binNMU xdmf:
> 
> nmu xdmf_2.1.dfsg.1-11 . amd64 . -m "Rebuild in clean environment."

Scheduled.

Thanks,
Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: