[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#752921: marked as done (transition: qtbase-opensource-src)

Your message dated Tue, 08 Jul 2014 01:02:29 +0200
with message-id <53BB2705.7080009@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#752921: transition: qtbase-opensource-src
has caused the Debian Bug report #752921,
regarding transition: qtbase-opensource-src
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
752921: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752921
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi! After uploading qtbase-opensource-src 5.3.1 to unstable without breaking
API/ABI (which would normally mean no transition needed), Sune discovered that
there is a runtime check for stuff using qobjectprivate [0]. As we have third-party
source packages (ie, not packaged by the Qt/KDE Team) we will sadly need a
transition for the small subset of private packages for every minor release
too :-(

I'm slowly preparing the rest of the Qt stack (I really didn't expected this)
and I'll be pushing the rest to experimental until we are ready or given the green
light for the transition to happen.

In case that in the meantime #752889 creates a problem for some other transition
do not heasitate to ping me (best if done both on this bug and on IRC) and
I'll upload 5.3.0 packages for what's already uploaded:

[qtbase qtdeclarative qtxmlpatterns qtscrip]-opensource-src

[0] <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752889>

Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconveniences generated.

Ben file:

title = "Qt 5.3.1 private symbols transition";
is_affected = .depends ~/qtbase-abi-5-3-0/ | .depends ~/qtbase-abi-5-3-1/ ;
is_good = .depends  ~/qtbase-abi-5-3-1/ ;
is_bad = .depends ~/qtbase-abi-5-3-0/ ;

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers testing
  APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable'), (1, 'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.14-1-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 27/06/14 21:27, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hi! After uploading qtbase-opensource-src 5.3.1 to unstable without breaking
> API/ABI (which would normally mean no transition needed), Sune discovered that
> there is a runtime check for stuff using qobjectprivate [0]. As we have third-party
> source packages (ie, not packaged by the Qt/KDE Team) we will sadly need a
> transition for the small subset of private packages for every minor release
> too :-(
> 
> I'm slowly preparing the rest of the Qt stack (I really didn't expected this)
> and I'll be pushing the rest to experimental until we are ready or given the green
> light for the transition to happen.
> 
> In case that in the meantime #752889 creates a problem for some other transition
> do not heasitate to ping me (best if done both on this bug and on IRC) and
> I'll upload 5.3.0 packages for what's already uploaded:
> 
> [qtbase qtdeclarative qtxmlpatterns qtscrip]-opensource-src
> 
> [0] <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=752889>
> 
> Thanks in advance and sorry for the inconveniences generated.

This is in now, closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: