[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#736150: marked as done (transition: libexosip2)

Your message dated Wed, 02 Jul 2014 12:13:40 +0200
with message-id <53B3DB54.4000705@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#736150: transition: libexosip2
has caused the Debian Bug report #736150,
regarding transition: libexosip2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
736150: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=736150
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hi,

Request a transition slot for libexosip2.

Thanks,
Mark

libexosip2-10
Reverse Depends:
  libexosip2-10:i386
  sipwitch
  linphone-nogtk
  linphone
  liblinphone5
  libexosip2-dev


Ben file:

title = "libexosip2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libexosip2-10" | .depends ~ "libexosip2-11";
is_good = .depends ~ "libexosip2-11";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libexosip2-10";


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 7.3
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 3.11-2-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_AU.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_AU.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 17/06/14 14:04, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
> On 05/06/14 20:28, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>> Control: tags -1 -confirmed
>>
>> On 27/05/14 17:08, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
>>> Control: tags -1 confirmed
>>>
>>> On 20/04/14 08:46, Mark Purcell wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 16 Mar 2014 19:37:52 Julien Cristau wrote:
>>>>> Are there any API changes?  Have the reverse deps been build tested?
>>>>
>>>> Julien,
>>>>
>>>> No API changes apparent.
>>>>
>>>> sipwitch	binNMU OK
>>>> linphone binNMU OK
>>>>
>>>> Updated Ben file:
>>>>
>>>> title = "libexosip2";
>>>> is_affected = .depends ~ "libosip2-10|libexosip2-10" | .depends ~ 
>>>> "libosip2-11|libexosip2-11";
>>>> is_good = .depends ~ "libosip2-11|libexosip2-11";
>>>> is_bad = .depends ~ "libosip2-10|libexosip2-10";
>>>
>>> I have updated the tracker (fixing "libfoo|libbar" to /libfoo|libbar/). libosip
>>> brings another rdep, siproxd. Can that one be handled with a binnmu? If so,
>>> please go ahead and upload libexosip and libosip to unstable.
>>
>> Please hold this until after the libgnutls-deb0-28 transition, as they clash and
>> that one is ongoing now.
> 
> That's done. You can proceed with this now.

And they are in. Closing.

Emilio

--- End Message ---
Reply to: